[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:49:02 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> If the submodules cannot be worktrees, then I think we have to
>> abandon this approach.
>
> I'm not sure. There are alternatives to using worktrees, so the fact
> that some of us use worktrees in some workflows should not necessarily
> veto the submodule solution to integrating ELPA into Emacs, because
> this integration is more important than personal workflows.
>
> But maybe I misunderstand what you mean by "submodule cannot be
> worktrees", because AFAIU Phillip raised an issue that is a different
> one: whether submodules live well with different branches being
> checked out in different worktrees -- there's nothing there to suggest
> that submodules themselves should be worktrees.
Just so.
The version of git (2.25.1) on my laptop reports worktree and submodules
as being broken.
And the 2.30 also the same https://git-scm.com/docs/git-worktree
There are ways around all of this, of course, but this use of submodules
will break my workflow at least.
Phil
- policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/20
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/21
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/22
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/23
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/24
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball,
Phillip Lord <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Andy Moreton, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26