[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: woman.el broken?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: woman.el broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:40:17 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 08:19:44 -0600
> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > If this is performant enough, I don't at the moment see any reason to
> > have it in C. Of course, the few places that call Flookup_key from C
> > will need to be analyzed whether they need to call the internal
> > function or the Lisp wrapper, and modified accordingly.
>
> OK. I will write up the patch and do some benchmarks.
Thanks.
> > This is not the only transformation we should apply, IMO: we should
> > also convert "Foo Bar Baz" into "foo-bar-baz". See the Dired menus
> > for examples.
>
> Yes, I will add that too.
>
> For "Foo Bar Baz", is it enough to look for "foo-bar-baz" or would we
> need to look for both "Foo-Bar-Baz" as well?
Based on what I see in our tree, only the former, but please
double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything.
- Re: woman.el broken?, (continued)
- Re: woman.el broken?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/01
- Re: woman.el broken?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/01
- Re: woman.el broken?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/01
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/02
- Re: woman.el broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/03
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: woman.el broken?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/05
- Re: woman.el broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/06