|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico |
Date: | Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:01:01 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 |
On 05.04.2021 23:49, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
Most completion frameworks I have looked at seem to limit themselves to the latter. To simplify, they collect all the options of a collection using all-completions and then narrow it depending on user input. Ido and all it's descendents (Ivy, Helm, Selectrum and now vertico) seem to be based on that approach.
I don't think that's true.I mean, the "plain" Ido does do that, and that limits its applicability to a select number of commands. ido-completing-read+, however, makes an effort to periodically refresh the collection obtained that way.
The rest, AFAIK, do it correctly right away, dynamically refreshing the matches after every user input.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |