[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 18:14:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 13:18:47 +0200
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> But this raises a more general question, of whether selecting-read and
>> completing-read should be drop-in replacements of one another.
>
> I think they should strive to, because it's conceivable that we will
> have a user option to determine which one to call where currently we
> call completing-read.
But why should that mean that both interfaces should be identical? It
seems cleaner to instead have a sr->cr translation layer, as to prevent
unnecessary dependencies between the two interfaces?
--
Philip K.
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, (continued)
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/10
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/04/10
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/10
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/04/10
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/04/10
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/04/10
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Jean Louis, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/04/11
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/04/12
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/04/12
- Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico, Eric Abrahamsen, 2021/04/12