Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter

[Stephen Leake]

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:

> On 7/29/21 19:28, Stephen Leake wrote:
>> "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:
>>
>>> That's not true. Tree Sitter is not written even partially in Rust. It
>>> does have Rust bindings for people who use Rust.
>> https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/tree/master/cli/src
>>
> That's an optional CLI and is not part of the library runtime.

Yes, and the optional CLI is part of the tree-sitter project, so the
statement "Tree Sitter is not written even partially in Rust" is simply
wrong.

Please be more careful when you say "tree-sitter", but mean
"tree-sitter runtime"; it is not always clear from context.

-- 
-- Stephe