|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Do shorthands break basic tooling (tags, grep, etc)? (was Re: Shorthands have landed on master) |
Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2021 22:30:37 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
On 28.09.2021 22:05, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Then we will avoid using it, or maybe even recommend that no one does. And perhaps replace shorthands with something better. But we aren't there anymore, and I think your sense of a catastrophe is unjustified, if not exaggerated.OK, how do you suggest I find all occurrences of jit-lock-functions in the Emacs Lisp sources after shorthands start being used? How do I find occurrences of a symbol in Emacs Lisp sources on the web, which currently a web search will find?
I imagine the answer will be 'xref-find-references', as soon as it grows support for the shorthands *shrug*
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |