|
From: | Tomas Hlavaty |
Subject: | Re: Do shorthands break basic tooling (tags, grep, etc)? (was Re: Shorthands have landed on master) |
Date: | Fri, 01 Oct 2021 01:59:38 +0200 |
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 at 18:10, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote: > > How do you propose I find all occurrences of jit-lock-functions in the > > Emacs Lisp sources, which up to now I've been able to do with find and > > grep? > > We can have a rule about when it is ok to define symbol-renaming in > the Emacs sources, just as we have a rule about defining advice in the > Emacs sources. > > This way, you could know about what renamings might exist, > and would know which symbols might have multiple names > and what argument to give to grep. What about cases where grep (or alternatives like rg or ag) are invoked manually? Or using a tool like eev and not via some clever Emacs function which computes the argument automatically?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |