[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Indentation of def*
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Indentation of def* |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:40:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm in favor of tweaking the heuristic and applying it only to macro
> definitions, which are (or should be) the majority of definition
> creating forms.
In-tree, there are more 2x as many macros that are called def* than
functions, and of those functions, about half of them really wants to
have (indent defun). (And most of the macros, but not all.)
So the macro/function thing is significant, but not compelling.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/13
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/14
- Re: Indentation of def*, Po Lu, 2021/10/15
- Re: Indentation of def*, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/15