[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Indentation of def*

From: João Távora
Subject: Re: Indentation of def*
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:41:11 +0100

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:40 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm in favor of tweaking the heuristic and applying it only to macro
> definitions, which are (or should be) the majority of definition
> creating forms.

In-tree, there are more 2x as many macros that are called def* than
functions, and of those functions, about half of them really wants to
have (indent defun).  (And most of the macros, but not all.)

So the macro/function thing is significant, but not compelling.

I'm sorry I couldn't parse this.  I sense you're trying to make
some kind of argument backed by statistics, but I cannot
understand it.  Can you explain again in some more detail,
for my benefit?.

Maybe with a short example for each of the classes you
mentioned.  And in-tree counts for each of those classes.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]