[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b' |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:05:26 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:54:23 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Btw, this 700-line list of "prefix commands" seems to be the result of
> > preloading iso-transl? So maybe we should rethink that decision?
>
> I think preloading iso-transl makes sense (i.e., it fixes a real UI
> thing), and I haven't seen anybody complain about it. It's just `C-h b'
> it affects negatively, I think, so I'd prefer fixing that instead.
Perhaps there's another solution for that UI thing, one that doesn't
have such adverse effects on "C-h b".
- Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/31
- Message not available
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/10/31