[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tick Reduction
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Tick Reduction |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> My vote would be for expanding the docstring syntax to also handle these
> things, and I think it'd be natural to base it on Org-mode. We might
> also want some other way to mark things as monospace that is not `foo'
> (in which case it will be linked if there is such a Lisp symbol, which
> is not correct e.g. when referring to the executables "man" or "whois").
I think it would be natural to do all "strings" in doc strings as
monospace, though.
> 3. A code fragment would look like:
>
> #+begin_src
> (defun foo () ...)
> #+end_src
I think going full Org in the doc strings would be excessive -- it's
pretty easy to detect Emacs Lisp.
But, sure, moving towards a more Org-like syntax might make sense.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Tick Reduction, (continued)
Re: Tick Reduction, Eric S Fraga, 2021/11/19
Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19