[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tick Reduction
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Tick Reduction |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:59:38 +0100 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> I think it would be natural to do all "strings" in doc strings as
> monospace, though.
Except for when you want to say things like:
This "frobnicates" the turbo encabulator.
IOW, where the thing in quotes are just regular words. I'm positive we
have such cases, but I can't remember where.
> I think going full Org in the doc strings would be excessive -- it's
> pretty easy to detect Emacs Lisp.
Yes, it must be slimmed down to its absolute bare essentials. IOW, we
should consider only those parts that we see a need for.
BTW, Markdown has a nice way to mark monospace blocks, if we want to
avoid relying on heuristics or simply provide a fire-escape if it fails:
```
like this
```
Although it is far less powerful than what Org-mode does, it is also
much simpler and less noisy.
- RE: [External] : Tick Reduction, (continued)
Re: Tick Reduction, Eric S Fraga, 2021/11/19
Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/19
Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19