[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NonGNU ELPA work
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: NonGNU ELPA work |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Jan 2022 11:39:46 +0000 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> What you request is a significant amount of additional clerical work
> for reasons I at least don't yet understand completely. And even if I
> did understand them, there's still the non-trivial issue of finding
> the volunteer(s) to do that job.
If as I understand just recording the acknowledgement and agreement with
the rules is sufficient, then it doesn't seem like the job would be too
clerical. I have suggested to Richard to log these directly in
nongnu.git within the commit message, whenever a contributor like me
adds a package for another developer.
--
Philip Kaludercic
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, (continued)
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Richard Stallman, 2022/01/05
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/06
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/06
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Richard Stallman, 2022/01/06
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/07
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Richard Stallman, 2022/01/07
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Glenn Morris, 2022/01/07
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/07
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Stefan Kangas, 2022/01/06
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Richard Stallman, 2022/01/02
- Re: NonGNU ELPA work,
Philip Kaludercic <=
Re: NonGNU ELPA work, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/01/29