Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps?

[Po Lu]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> A better benchmark is something like the following, since we're
> interested in byte compilation speed and not the rest:
>
> time for i in `seq 1 10`; do rm lisp/gnus/*.elc lisp/org/*.elc; make -j8; done
>
> This is 17% slower on my build machine on the branch compared to master.

How much does it affect native compilation?  Background native
compilation is already slow enough to be annoying.  Multiple people have
said that they disabled that feature because it was too slow, so making
it even slower would be a step in the wrong direction, IMHO.

Thanks.