Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps?

[Po Lu]

Óscar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es> writes:

> I didn't follow this thread so apologies in advance if I'm off-base, but
> I'm wondering what would happen if somebody comes with a patch that
> makes Emacs run X% faster with the side effect of making dianostics
> inaccurate.

I think bikeshedding is over a claim that the new feature (which finally
makes byte compiler warnings accurate) slows down Emacs by a dozen or so
percent.

Thanks.