Re: Systematic implicit aliases for option variables

[Eli Zaretskii]

On March 1, 2022 6:24:49 AM GMT+02:00, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> Does it make sense to define a command `customize-command' which takes
> a command name as argument and shows you the options that are
> pertinent to customizing that command?
> 
> If you give it `occur', it would recognize that that is an alias
> for `list-matching-lines', and show you the options pertinent to
> `list-matching-lines'.  You wouldn't need to know that `occur'
> is an alias.
> 
> I think the hard part of this would be adding a data base to find the
> custom groups that are pertinent to any particular command.
> 

Sounds like a natural extension of customize-apropos, which we already have?