Re: python minor-mode

[Barry Warsaw]

I haven’t looked at python.el in a long while but last time I did, it was not 
PEP 8 compliant.

-Barry

> On Mar 21, 2022, at 06:37, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@online.de> writes:
> 
> 
> The bigger question:
> 
> There were clearly reasons for the existence of these two in the past
> --- python.el and python-mode.el -- do those reasons still exist. They
> each have almost similar functionality -- and it may be worthwhile for
> some wise heads to come together and create a single, consolidated
> python package for emacs.
> 
> I can vouch from my own use that this split causes massive confusion.
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Currently, both python.el and python-mode.el define a minor-mode
>> called "python-mode". Which may create some confusion. Wouldn't it be
>> more natural if both files provide modes according to their filename?
>> I.e. python.el should establish "python" as minor-mode, python-mode.el
>> sends "python-mode".
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Andreas
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
> ♈ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP