[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : [ELPA] Package cleanup
From: |
John Yates |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : [ELPA] Package cleanup |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:05:21 -0400 |
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:05 PM Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> But again, whether some package starts to result
> in problems where it didn't previously doesn't
> follow from its not having been updated for 5
> years. Similarly, it doesn't at all follow that
> a package that's been updated a lot doesn't have
> problems, including doesn't introduce new problems
> from some recent update.
>
> Bugs and curating/testing are different from the
> question of update frequency or recentness.
Full agreement. Same holds true for a package on github.
Lack of update is merely a vague proxy for abandoned. And,
as you point out, abandonment does not imply non-functional.
But if there is no mechanism to, at least, identify decay then,
over time, the ratio of high quality packages to those of lesser
quality drops. Not a great recipe for brand maintenance.
Re: [ELPA] Package cleanup, Richard Stallman, 2022/03/29