Re: Tree-sitter api

[Po Lu]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> One thing that we should consider right now is the name-space.  You
> used tree-sitter-* names for all the symbols, and I'm asking whether
> we don't want something shorter, like ts-*.  This is a decision we
> must make now, because once we start using the code, there will be no
> way back.  Lars, WDYT?

I'm not Lars but the former seems fine to me, while I think the `ts'
namespace is already used by a Typescript package (or some third party
tree-sitter bindings, I forgot which).

Thanks.