[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: native compilation units

From: Lynn Winebarger
Subject: Re: native compilation units
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 22:39:01 -0400

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 2:12 AM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> I am curious as to why the system doesn't just produce trampolines for all
> the system calls AOT in a single module.

Trampolines are needed for any native-compiled function which
gets redefined.  We could try to build them eagerly when the
native-compiled function is compiled, and there could be various other
ways to handle this.  There's room for improvement here, but the current
system works well enough for a first version.

While I was going over the archives for answers to my questions (following Eli's 
observation), I found these gems:

I have the impression these ideas/concerns got lost in all the other work required
to get the first release ready, but I could have missed a follow-up definitively knocking
them down.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]