[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: native compilation units

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: native compilation units
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:37:09 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)

>  Would it make sense to add a feature for declaring a function symbol value
> is constant and non-advisable, at least within some notion of explicitly
> named scope(s)?  That would allow developers to be more selective about
> which functions are "exported" to library users, and which are defined as
> global function symbols because it's more convenient than wrapping
> everything in a package/module/namespace in a giant cl-flet and then
> explicitly "exporting" functions and macros via fset.

In which sense would it be different from:

      (defun ...)
      (defun ...)

-- Stefan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]