[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Abysmal state of GTK build

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Abysmal state of GTK build
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 05:38:01 +0300

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: larsi@gnus.org,  gregory@heytings.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:47:09 +0800
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > I don't understand: don't the non-GTK builds also support XInput2?  If
> > so, and if we make one of those non-GTK builds the default, people
> > will still have an XInput2 build, just not a GTK one.  Or what am I
> > missing?
> I meant if the GTK build is to stay the default.
> > If the default, non-GTK, build supports XInput2, then why is it a
> > problem to have the GTK build use XInput2 only as an opt-in feature?
> There is no problem with that, but only if GTK is turned off.

Then I think we should aim for the defaults described above.

What about builds with GTK 2 -- do they have fewer problems?  Can they
support XInput2 in a reasonable way?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]