[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: noverlay branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: noverlay branch |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:47:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Update: I can no longer see crashes on the latest commit in the branch.
Thanks for the update.
> There are a couple of glitches though:
> 1. hl-line-mode overlay sometimes disappear
> 2. notmuch search buffer hides text in wrong places (see the attached video)
Hmm... that's worrisome.
> Should I report these things as proper bugs or is it OK to discuss them
> within this thread?
As Eli said, bug-reports are best. I don't read the bug-reports list,
so I'd appreciate if you can add me to the `X-Debbugs-Cc:` when you
report those bugs.
> Also, I did a small test comparing Org mode folding performance (using
> overlays) on master vs feature/noverlay branch using the methodology
> described in https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2022-05-31-folding.html:
Very cool, thanks!
> We also have tests for marker scaling. If the overlay tree
> implementation can be reused for markers, it would also be great.
That's definitely not on the current menu. It's not out of the
question, but would require a fair bit more work and will come with
new tradeoffs.
Stefan
- Re: noverlay branch, (continued)
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/11
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/12
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/12
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/16
Re: noverlay branch, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/10/07
Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/08
Re: noverlay branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/23