Re: emacs-28 b7d7c2d9e9: Add cross-reference to alternative syntaxes for Unicode

[Christopher Dimech]

> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 7:31 AM
> From: "Richard Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
> To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: emacs-28 b7d7c2d9e9: Add cross-reference to alternative syntaxes 
> for Unicode
>
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > > I didn't ask people to go through all the existing
>   > > documentation and eliminate the Latin abbreviations.
>
>   > Alas, there are people among us who'd be driven to do precisely that,
>   > having read what you wrote.
>
> Replacing a Latin abbreviation is an improvement, but not an urgent or
> major improvement.  If someone feels like replacing some from time to
> time, in master, I see no reason not to.

There could be a rule, abbreviated-format and long-format.  And then it would
not matter what one uses.  Solves problem with everybody.