[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Allowing rolling release packages on ELPA

From: Philip Kaludercic
Subject: Re: Allowing rolling release packages on ELPA
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:31:43 +0000

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>> More importantly, it would be good to notice when that flag is out of
>>> date, i.e. signal an error if the `Version:` has changed when that flag
>>> is set.  Maybe simply require that flag to be set to a string (rather
>>> than just `t`) which is the expected version specified in `Version:` and
>>> then signal an error if they don't agree?
>> Sure, that can be done but I don't see why?
> Because more often than I'd like, upstream management changes without us
> being made aware of them.  So especially for discouraged flags, we should
> make extra sure that these flags are still desired.

How does this look like:

Attachment: 0001-Add-support-for-rolling-release-packages.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]