[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:44:07 -0700 |
> On Oct 28, 2022, at 9:15 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> Stefan Kangas [2022-10-28 08:57:07] wrote:
>> João Paulo Labegalini de Carvalho <jaopaulolc@gmail.com> writes:
>>> + (setq-local treesit-font-lock-feature-list
>>> + '((basic) (moderate) (elaborate)))
>> I see that most modes on the branch seem to be using those three symbols
>> for now.
>
> Indeed, it's sad. It's goes against the idea being
> `treesit-font-lock-feature-list` which is to map features to levels.
>
> It doesn't make much sense to call a highlight feature "moderate".
> Highlight feature names should be things like "function names", "nested
> functions", "multiline docstrings", "punctuation”.
Yeah it’s a kind of placeholder, plus a test for font-lock-maximum-decoration.
I plan to refine it once I’m done with more pressing problems.
Yuan
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, (continued)
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, João Paulo Labegalini de Carvalho, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, Stefan Kangas, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, Theodor Thornhill, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, João Paulo Labegalini de Carvalho, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, Yuan Fu, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/28
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter, Augusto Stoffel, 2022/10/29
- Re: Initial fontification in sh-mode with tree-sittter,
Yuan Fu <=