[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: vc-find-revision-no-save? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:07:42 -0700 |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> Adding a third value for `vc-find-revision-no-save', something like
> `if-remove', could be a nice default.
What would be the semantic of `if-remove'?
- vc-find-revision-no-save?, John Yates, 2022/10/23
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/24
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/24
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Dmitry Gutov, 2022/10/24
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/24
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/24
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Richard Stallman, 2022/10/28
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/29
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/29
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Andreas Schwab, 2022/10/29
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/29
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/29
- Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/29
Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?, Juri Linkov, 2022/10/24