[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Understanding end-of-defun

From: Yuan Fu
Subject: Re: Understanding end-of-defun
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:35:15 -0800

> On Oct 27, 2022, at 8:25 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>>> No, you're quite right.  We should double check that
>>> `beginning-of-defun-raw` was successful (and do something else if not).
>> How about:
> I haven't had a chance to try it out, but it looks good to me, tho
> `beginning-of-defun-raw` doesn't mention anything about its return value
> in the its docstring, so we may want to tweak that docstring (and
> review its code to make sure that it indeed returns the value we need
> in all cases, tho I suspect you've done so already).

(Sorry for the delay) Yes, it returns nil in all cases. Pretty sure that’s the 
intent from the very beginning (looking at git logs). How about this patch?


Attachment: end-of-defun.diff
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]