[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:29:34 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
xenodasein@tutanota.de writes:
> Lookup why functions are considered an improvement over macros.
I don't.
> As for compiler support, I bet the time spent debugging where there is
> support is going to dwarf where isn't, so trade-off is clear.
You mean, trading debugging time for runtime? That tradeoff was already
made the moment Emacs was written in C, and besides, modern debuginfo
formats already support macros.
- Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Brent Pappas, 2022/11/14
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/15
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, xenodasein, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, tomas, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, xenodasein, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2022/11/18
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/15