Re: Plug treesit.el into other emacs constructs

[Theodor Thornhill]

Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:

> Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:
>
>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>
>>>> If this code is plugged into transpose-sexps we get this nice behavior:
>>>
>>> It's a bit different from what SMIE would do, but there's a lot of
>>> overlap and when it's different it's arguably better, so sounds good
>>> to me.
>>>
>>
>> Great!
>>
>>>> Now forward/backward-sexp can actually work a little differently, as you
>>>> suggest, or we can let it use the same "move over siblings"-semantic.
>>>> In that case we don't even need the treesit-sexp-type-regexp variables to
>>>> control this, I think.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> I'm not sufficiently familiar with the tree-sitter tree to foresee
>>> precisely how it would affect `forward/backward-sexp`, but I think you
>>> have a good enough understanding to make a good judgment at this
>>> point :-)
>>
>> Great. I'll prepare a patch for this behavior, and we can discuss the
>> forward-* commands after that.
>>
>
> What do you think about this?  Feel free to try it and let me know if
> something is completely wrong :-)

Now you can use 'arg' as well.

0001-Add-treesit-transpose-sexps.patch
Description: Text Data