[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29 |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:05:55 +0000 |
Hello, Gregory.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:06:32 +0000, Gregory Heytings wrote:
> >> That's not a tree-sitter problem per se, it's "only" a matter of
> >> someone taking the time to define a tree-sitter grammar for these
> >> variants of the C language. What is not possible is to define "one
> >> grammar to rule them all", IOW, one grammar that would magically
> >> recognize in which variant of the C language a given file is written.
> > CC Mode happens to do that fine.
> I fear you contradict yourself. You cannot say, in a thread which you
> started to explain that CC Mode fontification is broken (it "fills the
> buffer with green splotches (making fontification useless)"), that CC Mode
> fontification works fine.
There is no contradiction in what Po said. The fact that CC Mode
fontification has bugs in no way contradicts its ability to parse older
variants of C as well as newer ones.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, (continued)
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/01/10
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/10
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/09
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, Gregory Heytings, 2023/01/10
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, Po Lu, 2023/01/10
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, Gregory Heytings, 2023/01/10
- Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29,
Alan Mackenzie <=
Re: CC Mode troubles and Emacs 29, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/01/09