[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master? |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2023 08:32:23 +0000 (UTC) |
>> I am seeing the same symptoms as Uwe on openSUSE 15.4: The first emoji
>> shows in emacs but not the second, but both are visible in chrome.
I'm using openSUSE 15.4, too, and in my Emacs (self-compiled from git two
weeks ago) I see both Emojis (image attached).
>> Moreover, I've had the distro-supplied noto-coloremoji-fonts RPM
>> since I installed 15.4 last summer, so it would seem to be a
>> difference between the way emacs and chrome go about finding that
>> font. But I don't know enough about that code to dig further.
Here is the info I get for the second emoji.
```
position: 4887 of 5275 (93%), column: 29
character: 🤷 (displayed as 🤷) (codepoint 129335, #o374467, #x1f937)
charset: unicode (Unicode (ISO10646))
code point in charset: 0x1F937
script: emoji
syntax: w which means: word
category: .:Base
to input: type "C-x 8 RET 1f937" or "C-x 8 RET SHRUG"
buffer code: #xF0 #x9F #xA4 #xB7
file code: not encodable by coding system ctext-unix
display: composed to form "🤷♂️" (see below)
composition name: man shrugging
Composed with the following character(s) "♂️" using this font:
ftcrhb:-GOOG-Noto Color Emoji-regular-normal-normal-*-18-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1
by these glyphs:
[0 3 129335 2731 22 0 23 17 5 nil]
with these character(s):
(#x200d) ZERO WIDTH JOINER
♂ (#x2642) MALE SIGN
️ (#xfe0f) VARIATION SELECTOR-16
Character code properties: customize what to show
name: SHRUG
general-category: So (Symbol, Other)
decomposition: (129335) ('🤷')
```
In the output of `fc-list` I see the line
```
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/NotoColorEmoji.ttf: Noto Color Emoji:style=Regular
```
which is part of the `noto-coloremoji-fonts` openSUSE package.
Werner

- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, (continued)
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Bob Rogers, 2023/02/11
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Bob Rogers, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Bob Rogers, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Po Lu, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Po Lu, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2023/02/12
- Re: has the emoji support been enhanced on master?, Po Lu, 2023/02/12