[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking"
From: |
John Yates |
Subject: |
Re: parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking" |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Apr 2023 08:01:07 -0400 |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:49 PM Stephen Leake
<stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
>
> That's because the tree-sitter
> algorithm does not insert symbols, it only skips them.
Is this a fundamental architectural limitation of tree-sitter's parsing
scheme? Was it a design decision that trying insertions would be
too costly? Or is it an improvement that should be explored?
Has this been discussed in the wider tree-sitter community? I would
be surprised if emacs is the first to encounter this weakness.
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", (continued)
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", Daniel Colascione, 2023/04/03
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/03
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", João Távora, 2023/04/04
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", Daniel Martín, 2023/04/07
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/07
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", Yuan Fu, 2023/04/07
- Re: treesit indentation "blinking", Daniel Martín, 2023/04/08
- parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking", Stephen Leake, 2023/04/03
- Re: parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking",
John Yates <=
- Re: parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking", Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/04
- Re: parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking", Stephen Leake, 2023/04/04
- Re: parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking", Stephen Leake, 2023/04/04
- Re: parser error recovery algorithm vs treesit indentation "blinking", Dmitry Gutov, 2023/04/04