[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 52b67740d10: Generalise a LAP optimisation rule
From: |
Joseph Mingrone |
Subject: |
Re: master 52b67740d10: Generalise a LAP optimisation rule |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:13:45 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 08:10, Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> wrote:
> Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca> writes:
>> On Sat, 2023-03-25 at 12:22, Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> wrote:
>>> branch: master
>>> commit 52b67740d10df8ca539fdc2c7d50283997683141
>>> Author: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
>>> Commit: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
>>> Generalise a LAP optimisation rule
>>> * lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el (byte-optimize-lapcode):
>>> Accept (stack-set 1) as equivalent to (discardN-preserve-tos 1) in a
>>> rule previously overlooked. This is usually beneficial in code size
>>> and almost always shortens dynamic paths.
>>> ---
>>> lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el
>>> index 3c7aeb89525..0891ec80beb 100644
>>> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el
>>> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-opt.el
>>> @@ -2765,7 +2765,9 @@ If FOR-EFFECT is non-nil, the return value is assumed
>>> to be of no importance."
>>> (or (memq (caar tmp) '(byte-discard byte-discardN))
>>> ;; Make sure we don't hoist a
>>> discardN-preserve-tos
>>> ;; that really should be merged or deleted
>>> instead.
>>> - (and (eq (caar tmp) 'byte-discardN-preserve-tos)
>>> + (and (or (eq (caar tmp)
>>> 'byte-discardN-preserve-tos)
>>> + (and (eq (caar tmp) 'byte-stack-set)
>>> + (eql (cdar tmp) 1)))
>>> (let ((next (cadr tmp)))
>>> (not (or (memq (car next)
>>>
>>> '(byte-discardN-preserve-tos
>> Hello,
>> This commit causes native compilation builds on FreeBSD to fail with the
>> error
>> native-ice ("org/org-plot.el" "block does not end with a branch"...
>> The full error is below and a link to a complete build log (FreeBSD
>> package build) is also included.
>> When the commit is reverted, the build finishes successfully again.
>> Joe
> Hi Joe,
> thanks for reporting, yes we are tracking this as bug#62537.
> Best Regards
> Andrea
Hi Andrea,
Sure and thanks to you and Eli for clarification. Also, apologies for
not locating bug#62537 before reporting there.
Kind regards,
Joe