[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: c-ts-mode
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: c-ts-mode |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:00:59 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> I'll leave that to you, but FWIW I've frequently had unsolicited
> positive feedback on CLOS-based customization techniques, including two
> recent ones:
>
> bug#65418
> https://github.com/joaotavora/breadcrumb/issues/6#issuecomment-1710745508
>
> This seems to indicate that, all other things being equal, if users
> are asked to go to Elisp, they don't mind (and actually enjoy) using
> CLOS (or at least defgeneric) APIs.
But Custom itself fails to support EIEIO and defgenerics, so we should
only introduce such defgenerics as user options when it is clear that
the only users with reason to set them are already adept in Emacs Lisp.
- Re: c-ts-mode, (continued)
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/09
- Re: c-ts-mode, Petteri Hintsanen, 2023/09/09
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/09
- Re: c-ts-mode, Yuan Fu, 2023/09/11
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/12
- Re: c-ts-mode,
Po Lu <=
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/12