[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: c-ts-mode
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: c-ts-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Sep 2023 19:30:15 +0100 |
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:23 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > If so, then going that route means basically writing a translator
> > of clang-format -> Emacs treesitter rules. Maybe it's easier than
> > I think, and the main advantage is it will plug into
> > indent-line-function and indent-region-function rather easily.
> > And, who knows, some code can be reused for writing translators of
> > other formatters.
> Yes.
>
> > Anyway I wouldn't discard the "LSP shortcut" idea.
>
> I didn't discard it.
OK. But the TODO item doesn't mention it. I think prospective
volunteers should eventually be steered to this discussion to
learn about these trade-offs. Some entries in etc/TODO have
links to lists.gnu.org. I suggest to add one in the item to our
conversation.
João
- Re: c-ts-mode, (continued)
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode,
João Távora <=
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/09
- Re: c-ts-mode, Petteri Hintsanen, 2023/09/09
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/09
- Re: c-ts-mode, Petteri Hintsanen, 2023/09/13
- Re: c-ts-mode, Yuan Fu, 2023/09/11
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/12
- Re: c-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/09/12