Re: [External] : Re: [PATCH] color-hsv-to-rgb

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> CC: "stefankangas@gmail.com" <stefankangas@gmail.com>,
>         "jporterbugs@gmail.com"
>       <jporterbugs@gmail.com>,
>         "dov.grobgeld@gmail.com" <dov.grobgeld@gmail.com>,
>         "emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:04:48 +0000
> 
> > > > What are the main things besides
> > > > `color-hsv-to-rgb' that hexrgb.el has
> > > > but color.el doesn't, in your view?
> > >
> > > Sorry, but I don't know and I don't care.
> > 
> > That's just rude.
> 
> It's not rude at all.

You were kindly asked to help Emacs developers decide which parts of
hexrgb.el could be useful for Emacs.  You replied that you didn't
care.  If that is not rudeness, then I don't know what rudeness is.

> If anyone is interested in finding what
> else might be of interest for Emacs in
> hexrgb.el, they are _welcome_ to take a
> look.  The file isn't large, the source
> code is accessible and clear, I've signed
> FSF papers, and I give my permission if
> any of hexrgb.el is to be used.

You were asked to provide your POV on this.  Why would you reply to a
reasonable request in such a rude way is anyone's guess.

> Look inside it or don't; I really don't
> care.  Should I?

You should, if you care about Emacs.

> Is it rude not to care, and to let you know straightforwardly that I
> don't?

It is.

> Is it hard, for any who really want to know, to look inside the file
> and decide for themselves?

It is hard for anyone but you to know what is your POV on this issue.