[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code for cond*
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: Code for cond* |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:08:28 +0000 |
> > consciously introducing such needless proliferation does not strike me
> > as a particularly good way to design a programming system.
>
> +1 to everything said. And if cond* does show up somewhere, please
> really implementing its interface in terms of pcase, whenever possible
^^^
consider
- Re: Code for cond*, (continued)
- Re: Code for cond*, Andrea Corallo, 2024/01/18
- Re: Code for cond*, João Távora, 2024/01/19
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/20
- Re: Code for cond*, Adam Porter, 2024/01/21
- Re: Code for cond*, tomas, 2024/01/22
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/23
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, João Távora, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*,
João Távora <=
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, João Távora, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24