Re: Code for cond*

[Po Lu]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> If it does _not_ come with such a plan, it's slightly better.  But then
> that begs the question: why add it?

Because it will forever free us of such forms as:

  (let (x y z)
    (cond ((eq (setq x ...) 'bar)
           yyy)
          ((setq y (... x))
           zzz)
          ...and so on

This alone is too important a feature to be consigned to ELPA.