[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Code for cond*

From: Emanuel Berg
Subject: Re: Code for cond*
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:28:09 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Alan Mackenzie wrote:

>> While I don't want to claim that `pcase' is perfect and
>> impossible to improve upon, I don't find
>> `cond*' convincing.
> Richard's point, and I agree with it, is that pcase is so
> far from perfect that it needs replacing.

Okay, I thought you guys had peaceful co-existence in mind.

If "cond*" is actually intended to push out and replace
`pcase', then that idea is just bizarre and I agree with
almost everyone else saying one shouldn't add "cond*".

Sorry, put it in GNU ELPA. I have a package there so I know it
is a very nice place actually.

underground experts united

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]