[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code for cond*
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Code for cond* |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:45:13 -0800 |
JD Smith <jdtsmith@gmail.com> writes:
> But oddly enough, this thread discussing its potential replacement has
> given me the key insight — “imagine running list interpolation
> backwards”. With that mental model, I find I can now read pcase forms
> much more easily and confidently. A short introductory paragraph in
> the elisp pcase documentation which explains this approach to its
> novel syntax would have gone a long way for me.
Patches welcome.
- Re: Code for cond*, (continued)
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/25
Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/19
Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/23
- Re: Code for cond*, JD Smith, 2024/01/23
- Re: Code for cond*,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: Code for cond*, JD Smith, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, JD Smith, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/24
- RE: [External] : Re: Code for cond*, Drew Adams, 2024/01/24
RE: [External] : Re: Code for cond*, Drew Adams, 2024/01/24
Re: Code for cond*, Madhu, 2024/01/25
Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/25
Re: Code for cond*, JD Smith, 2024/01/25