Re: Code for cond*

[Emanuel Berg]

Po Lu wrote:

> The technical arguments have already been argued to
> exhaustion, and only subjective issues remain outstanding,
> which a consensus will never form around.

If a consensus cannot be reached, obey tradition.

And don't say your proposed, untested solution should replace
something that has been operational for over a decade and is
used even as we speak.

What you can say is "Hey, we have something interesting here,
take a look, hopefully it will gain traction if people are
appealed by it".

But you are not saying that because you yourself are not
confident cond* really has any such advantages over `pcase' to
motivate anything close to this kind of
confrontational approach.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal