[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase
|
From: |
Tomas Hlavaty |
|
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase |
|
Date: |
Wed, 07 Feb 2024 18:44:04 +0100 |
On Wed 07 Feb 2024 at 21:43, Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry to interject, but this really suggests that `cl-case' should
> become, simply, `case'
that would be great, also ecase would be good to have without cl-lib
- Re: cond* vs pcase, (continued)
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/06
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Adam Porter, 2024/02/06
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/06
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Po Lu, 2024/02/07
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase,
Tomas Hlavaty <=
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/08
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/08
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Po Lu, 2024/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Po Lu, 2024/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/08
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/08
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/08
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Po Lu, 2024/02/08