Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?

[Andrea Corallo]

"T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:

> it's not my code, which is the issue. VM is a third party package and
> no longer maintained, but I happen to use it as my primary mail reder
>
> It uses  macros where it should likely have used defsubst.
>
>>From what I remember and this might ell have changed:
>
> 1. It's build el->elc relied on specific ordering of byte compilation.
> 2. Native comp from .elc->.eln -- rather than .el->.eln
> 3. 1 2 and the different order of compilation resulted in broken eln
>    files that threw errors at random when using VM

Yes, it's a missing require that is unidentified by the byte-compiler.
We are discussing this since like three years, I believe should be
sufficient.

As suggested if nobody wants to fix it just adding the package to
'native-comp-jit-compilation-deny-list' will work around the bug.

  Andrea