[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:42:46 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu> writes:
> On 6/26/2024 9:59 PM, Po Lu wrote:
>> Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu> writes:
>>>
>>> I guess the problem is pretty obvious. You just have to move "#ifdef
>>> WINDOWSNT" at line 1541 down a few lines.
>>>
>>> Ken
>> Please try again.
>
> You're testing 'uniscribe' before it's been assigned a value:
>
> /* Don't register if Uniscribe is not available. */
> HMODULE uniscribe;
> if (!uniscribe)
> return;
>
> Ken
Right. In my defense it is fairly challenging to cut and paste text on
a phone.
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, (continued)
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Ken Brown, 2024/06/23
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Po Lu, 2024/06/23
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Corwin Brust, 2024/06/25
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Ken Brown, 2024/06/24
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Ken Brown, 2024/06/24
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Ken Brown, 2024/06/25
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Po Lu, 2024/06/26
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Ken Brown, 2024/06/27
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Po Lu, 2024/06/27
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Ken Brown, 2024/06/27
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Po Lu, 2024/06/29
- Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/15