[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Heap corruption?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Heap corruption? |
Date: |
21 Aug 2003 17:15:26 +0900 |
address@hidden (Gerd Moellmann) writes:
> > (I've wondered if there are some systems that locate the heap in an
> > area with a high bit set; can emacs simply not run there?).
>
> There's is DATA_SEG_BITS in lisp.h, but I don't know which
> contemporary systems use it, if any; it was used on rt-pc according to
> a comment there. DATA_SEG_BITS can be used to specify some constant
> high bits to add when unboxing a pointer to a Lisp object.
Hmm, I suppose that'd help you work around such systems. Still,
low-bit tags seem safer and nicer all-round.
-Miles
--
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
- Re: Heap corruption?, (continued)
- Re: Heap corruption?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/19
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/19
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/22
- Message not available
- Re: Heap corruption?, Kim F. Storm, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/21
- Re: Heap corruption?, Kim F. Storm, 2003/08/21
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: Heap corruption?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Heap corruption?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/23
- Re: Heap corruption?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/23
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/23
- Message not available
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/21