[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Heap corruption?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Heap corruption? |
Date: |
22 Aug 2003 17:45:29 +0900 |
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
> It is also trivial to extend the range of integers by another factor
> of 2 by splitting the Lisp_Int into Lisp_Int0 and Lisp_Int1 (we're
> only using 7 of the 8 available tags right now).
Yes, that would be a good idea. Is there any reason not to just do it
now? It seems like a 5-minute hack which would make some people very
happy.
[In the (probably unlikely) case that the extra int tag is wanted back
for some reason, it also seems like it would be pretty painless to
revert (except for pissing off the above-mentioned people).]
-Miles
--
Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement)
- Re: Heap corruption?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Heap corruption?, Kim F. Storm, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/21
- Re: Heap corruption?, Kim F. Storm, 2003/08/21
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: Heap corruption?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/21
- Re: Heap corruption?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/23
- Re: Heap corruption?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/23
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/23
- Message not available
- Re: Heap corruption?, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/22
- Re: Heap corruption?, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/21