[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invisible
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: invisible |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:34:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 05:22:12PM -0600, Luc Teirlinck wrote:
> Point standing still, ignoring the DOWN arrow, is pretty confusing. It
> clearly bothers both Klaus and Kazu. Obviously, the problems are not
> breaking bootstrapping or making Emacs crash all the time, so they are not
> _super_-urgent. On the other hand, I would _not_ agree that they are that
> minor that we can just wait until some vague and distant future
line-move had the same bogus behavior before Stefan's changes though, so
turning on line-move-ignore-invisible seems like the only easy short-term
solution.
My short experimentation with line-move-ignore-invisible (before I ran into
the bogus xassert I posted about earlier) seemed to suggest it solved this
problem.
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
- Re: invisible, (continued)
- Re: invisible, Klaus Zeitler, 2004/02/26
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Miles Bader, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: invisible, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/29
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28