|
From: | Katsumi Yamaoka |
Subject: | Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus |
Date: | Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:10:44 +0900 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> In <address@hidden> >>>>> Stefan <address@hidden> wrote: >> (if (fboundp 'message) >> (defalias 'foo 'message) >> (defalias 'foo 'ignore)) > (defalias 'foo > (if (fboundp 'message) 'message 'ignore)) That's okay. >> If it is normal, we will have to use `eval-and-compile' to >> surround similar `defalias' forms in many places. > Yuck. Why do people feel like it's better to use ugly hacks than to get > a few warnings ? Because it will grow up to be not a few numbers of warnings if we don't take any countermeasure. It makes it hard to find important messages from such chaos. Gnus was made not to issue such negligible warnings until now.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |