[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:44:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Hmmm. Well, I'd say just rewrite defstruct to not use cl functions.
That might be an option, indeed.
> Anyway, wouldn't such wrapping address at least majority of such cases? The
> reason I'm going on about this is that I think it's a much more
> understandable way of fixing such warnings (in that it directly shows what's
> going on) than using `with-no-warnings' (which is a pretty blunt tool).
Agreed.
Stefan
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, (continued)
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/14
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/14
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Miles Bader, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Miles Bader, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/15
- Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/16